Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities
Articles Information
Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, Vol.7, No.2, Jun. 2021, Pub. Date: Jun. 2, 2021
Academic Cheating Behaviour Among Students in Higher Education Institutions in Malaysia
Pages: 108-113 Views: 43 Downloads: 5
[01] Chiam Chooi Chea, Cluster of Business and Management, Open University Malaysia, Selangor, Malaysia.
[02] Lim Yee Wui, Faculty of Accountancy and Management, Universiti Tunku Abdul Rahman, Selangor, Malaysia.
[03] Kue Wei Ling, Faculty of Accountancy and Management, Universiti Tunku Abdul Rahman, Selangor, Malaysia.
Academic cheating behaviour (ACB) is a form of academic dishonesty committed by students and it is one of the common ethical problems faced by all tertiary education institutions in the world. There are several types of academic cheating and one of the common act among students is examination cheating because an examination is a test at which the students demonstrate their individual skills and ability within the framework and on the set-conditions by the education institution, whether it is academically or physically. Examination cheating is not tandem with the purpose of education, which is to develop graduates with good values- beyond merely human capital. ACB is seen as a serious offend in the academia as it reflects the integrity, honesty and good ethics of graduates at the tertiary level before commencing their work in the corporate environment. This issue has to be removed from the tertiary education, in which, the education institutions play a vital role. This study would be able highlight the factors that are affecting the examination behaviour among students in higher education institutions in Malaysia. The results of this study would be able to provide insights to the administrators and policy makers to develop relevant policies or regulations in order to reduce this unethical behaviour among students in the higher education institutions in Malaysia.
Academic Cheating Behaviour, Ethical, Academic Dishonesty
[01] Carrell, S. E., Malmstrom, F. V., & West, J. E. (2008). Peer effects in academic cheating. Journal of human resources, 43 (1), 173-207.
[02] Chiesel, N. (2007). Pragmatic methods to reduce dishonesty in web-based courses. A. Orellana, 327-399.
[03] Desalegn, A. A. and Berhan, A. (2014), “Cheating on examinations and its predictors among undergraduate students at Hawassa University College of Medicine and Health Science”, BMC Medical Education, Vol. 14 No. 89, pp. 1-11.
[04] Eriksson Li & McGee. T. R (2014). Cheating on examinations and its predictors among undergraduate students at Hawassa University College of Medicine and Health Science, Hawassa, Ethiopia. BMC Medical Education 14 (1): 89.
[05] Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2014). Pearson new international edition. In Multivariate data analysis, Seventh Edition. Pearson Education Limited Harlow, Essex.
[06] Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., and Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modelling, Journal of the Academy o marketing Science,. 43 (1): 15-135.
[07] Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M, Ringle. C. M., Sarstedt, M. (2014). A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). Thousand Oaks. Sage.
[08] Iberahim, H., Hussein, N., Samat, N., Noordin, F. and Daud, N. (2013), “Academic dishonesty: why business students participate in these practices?”, Procedia – Social and Behavioural Sciences, Vol. 90 No. 1, pp. 152-156.
[09] Ifeagwazi, C. M., Chukwuorji, J. C., Egbodo, S. O., & Nwoke, M. B. (2019). Peer pressure, fear of failure and examination cheating behaviour in the university: Does gender make the difference?. Cognition, Brain, Behaviour, 23 (1), 43-62.
[10] Ismail, S. and Yussof, S. H., (2016). Accounting Research Journal Cheating behaviour among accounting students: some Malaysian evidence. Accounting Research Journal Iss Accounting Research Journal, 29 (1): 20–33.
[11] Jordan A. E. (2001). College student cheating: the role of motivation, perceived norms, attitudes, and knowledge of institutional policy. Ethics Behav. 11 233–247 10.1207/S15327019EB1103_3
[12] Kwong, T., Ng, H. M., Mark, K. P., & Wong, E. (2010). Students' and faculty's perception of academic integrity in Hong Kong. Campus-Wide Information Systems, 27 (5), 341-355.
[13] Love, P. G., & Simmons, J. (1998). Factors influencing cheating and plagiarism among graduate students in a college of education. College Student Journal.
[14] Murdock, T. B., & Stephens, J. M. (2007). Is cheating wrong? Students' reasoning about academic dishonesty. In Psychology of academic cheating (pp. 229-251). Academic Press.
[15] Mustapha, R., Hussin, Z., Siraj, S., & Darusalam, G. (2017). Academic Dishonesty Among Higher Education Students: The Malaysian Evidence (2014 To 2016). KATHA, 13 (1), 73-93.
[16] Sims, R. L. (1993). The relationship between academic dishonesty and unethical business practices. Journal of Education for Business, 68 (4), 207-211
[17] Siyat Shukri Ahmed (2018). Impact of Cheating University Examination on Quality of Education in Kenya. European Journal of Education Studies. 5 (1), 272-287 doi: 10.5281/zenodo.1419300
[18] Šprajc, P., Urh, M., Jerebic, J., Trivan, D., & Jereb, E. (2017). Reasons for plagiarism in higher education. Organizacija, 50 (1), 33-45.
[19] Wilcox, J. R., & Ebbs, S. L. (1992). Promoting an ethical campus culture: The values audit. NASPA Journal, 29 (4), 253-260.
MA 02210, USA
AIS is an academia-oriented and non-commercial institute aiming at providing users with a way to quickly and easily get the academic and scientific information.
Copyright © 2014 - American Institute of Science except certain content provided by third parties.