[01] Eneji C. V. O., Dept. of Environmental Education, Faculty of Education, University of Calabar, Calabar, Nigeria;Dept. of Geography, School of Environmental Sciences, Modibbo Adama University of Technology, Yola, Nigeri. [02] Mubi A. M., Dept. of Geography, School of Environmental Sciences, Modibbo Adama University of Technology, Yola, Nigeria. [03] Husain M. A., Dept. of Urban and Regional Planning, School of Environmental Sciences, Modibbo Adama University of Technology, Yola, Nigeria. [04] Ogar D. A., Dept. of Forestry and Wildlife Resources Management, Faculty of Agriculture, Forestry and Wildlife, University of Calabar, Calabar, Nigeria.

This study was designed to assess factors/constrains to gender participation in the exploitation and management of forest resources within the protected areas of the Cross River National Park enclave communities. The quantitative research design was adopted for the study. A null hypothesis of no factors/constrains to gender participation in the management of forest resources was formulated. 638 respondents were sampled using the stage-wise random sampling technique from a population of about 4249 people living within the six enclave communities of Okwangwo, Okwa 1 and 2, Mkpot, Abung and Iku all within Boki and Akamkpa local government areas of Cross River National Park , of Okwangwo and Oban respectively (15%). The instrument for data collection was a well structured questionnaire divided into two sections with four point likert scale response options. Data collected using the instrument was coded and transformed into SPSS version 16 and analyzed using the multiple regressions analysis. Ten factors: Sex, age, marital status, educational status, cultural factors, religion, household income, occupational status, household heads and property rights were suggested as being responsible for gender participation in the management of forest resources. The result of the regression analysis shows a yielded coefficient of regression correlation (R) of .351 and a multiple regression R-square (R2) of .123, and adjusted R2of .109, at .01 significant level, the result is significant, the result also shows that an analysis of variance (ANOVA) of the multiple regressions produced an F-ratio of 8.817, while the f-critical value is 1.91 (2-tailed). The standardized regression beta weight ranged from -.021 to -3.980, the beta weight of four factors (sex, -3.980, marital status, -2.056, educational status,-3.111 and occupational status, -2.618) were significant at 0.05 level of significance, while the other six factors (age, .462, cultural factors, .395, religion, 1.052, household income, -.123, household heads, -.021 and property rights, -.660) were not significant at 0.05 significant level, meaning that they might not necessarily contribute to gender participation in forest resources management. It was therefore recommended that women in every society should be given free hands to participate in management activities and all cultural and social barriers acting as hindrance to gender participation in management activities should be removed to allow women contribute their ideas in situation and decisions that may affect them most.

Gender Participation, Forest Management, Enclave Communities, Cross River National Park, Gender Equality and Ecofeminism

[01] Agarwal A, and Gupta K. (2005).Decentralization and participation: The governance of common pool resources in Nepal’s Terai. World Dev., 33: 1101-1114. [02] Agarwal B (2001).Participatory exclusions, community forestry, and gender: An analysis for South Asia and a conceptual framework. World Dev., 29: 2145-2145. [03] Agarwal, B. (2009).Gender and forest conservation: the impact of women's participation in community forest governance. Ecological Economics 68(11), 2785-2799. [04] Agrawal A and Chhatre A., (2006).Explaining success on the commons: community forest governance in the India Himalaya. World Dev. 34(1), 149-166. [05] Agrawal, A. and Redford, K. (2006).Poverty, Development, and Biodiversity Conservation: Shooting in the Dark? WCS Working paper no. 26 march http://www.wcs.org/science [06] Arnold, J.E.M. (1998). ‘Managing Forests as Common Property’. Forestry Paper 136. Rome: FAO. [07] Berg B.L. (2009).Qualitative research methods for the social sciences, 7th ed. Allyn and Backon, Boston. [08] Bolzendahl C. and Brooks C., (2007).Women’s political representation and welfare state spending in twelve capitalist democracies. Social Forces; 85: 1509–1534. doi: 10.1353/sof.2007.0061. [09] Brockington, D. (2003). Injustice and Conservation: Is Local Support Necessary for Sustainable Protected Areas? Policy Matters 12: 22- 30 [10] Buchy M. and Subba S (2003).Why is community forestry a social- and gender- blind technology? The case of Nepal, Gender Tech. Dev., 7, 313-332 [11] Center for International Forestry Research (2008).CIFOR’s strategy 2008-2018: making a difference for forest and people. Center for international forestry research, Bogor, Indonesia (online) URL: http//www.cifor.org/publications/pdf_files/Books.CIFOR strategy0801.pdf [12] Christie, M.E and Giri, K., (2011).Challenges and experiences of women in the forestry sector in Nepal, International Journal of Sociology and Anthropology, 3(5), 139-146, May 2011, Available online http://www.academicjournals.org/ijsa [13] Clark, N, (2003) ‘Feral ecologies: performing life on the colonial periphery’. In B. Szersynski, W. Heim and C. Warerton (eds0 Nature performed: environment, culture and performance, Oxford: Blackwell, pp163-182 [14] Colfer, C. J. P. (ed.) (2005). The Equitable Forest: Diversity, Community and Resource Management, Washington DC: Resources for the Future Colombia. [15] Connell RW (2005). Masculinities: Second edition. UC Press, California. [16] Contreras, A., Dachang, L., Edmunds, D., Kelkar, G., Nathan, D., Sarin, M., Singh, N. and Wollenberg, E. (2008) forthcoming… [17] Coulibaly- Lingani, P., Savadogo, P., Tigabu, M and Oden P.C. (2011). Factors influencing people's participation in the forest management program in Burkina Faso, West Africa. Forest Policy and Economics, 13(4), 292–302, April 2011. [18] Crook, R.C. and Manor, J. (1998).Democracy and Decentralization in South Asia and West Africa: Participation, Accountability and Performance. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. [19] Cross River National Park, (2011). Information Bulletin, No. 29, Issue 5 [20] Cudd, A. (2006). Analyzing Oppression. New York: Oxford University Press. [21] Dalton R.J. (2008).Citizenship norms and the expansion of political participation .Political Studies, 56: 76–98. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9248.2007.00718.x. [Cross Ref], DOI: 10.1080/13504501003749992 [22] Doss, C .R, (2001).Designing agricultural technology for African women farmers: lesson from 25 years of experience, World Dev., 29 (11) 2075-2092. [23] Eneji, V.C.O. Qi G., Okpiliya, F.I., Aniah, E.J., Eni, D.D. and Afanghideh, D., (2009b). Problems of Public Participation in Biodiversity Conservation: the Nigerian Scenario, Journal of Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 27(4), 301-307, December. [24] Eneji, V.C.O, Qi G., Jian X., Oden S. Nand Okpiliya F. E., (2009a).A Review of the Dynamics of Forest Resources Valuation and Community Livelihood: Issues, Arguments and concerns, Journal of Agriculture, Biotechnology and Ecology, 2(2), 201-231, [25] Ezebilo, E.E. and Mattsson, L., (2010a). Contribution of non-timber forest products to livelihoods of communities in southeast Nigeria, International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 17(3), 231-235 [26] Ezebilo, E.E. and Mattsson, L., (2010b). Socio-economic benefits of protected areas as perceived by local people around Cross River National Park, Nigeria, Forest Policy and Economics, 12(3), 189–193. March 2010, [27] Follo G (2002).A hero's journey: Young women among males in forestry education. J. Rural Stud., 18: 293-306. [28] German, L W, Mazengia S, Ayele W, Tirwonwe, J, Tanui H, Taye L, Begashaw, S, Nyangas A, Chemangeni W, Chaptegei M, Tsegaye Z, Admassu F, Alinyo A, Makennen, K, Aberra, T Tolera, Z, Jotte and K Bedane (2008). Enabling equitable collective action and policy change for poverty reduction and improved natural resource management in Eastern Africa highlands. Collective action and property rights (CAPRI) Working Paper 86, International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington DC, USA. [29] Giri K, Wocan, I. and Faculty, O.F., (2008b).Reflecting on Experiences: Women in the Forestry Sector in Nepal. MemCoE IOF Discussion. [30] Goetz, A.M., (2003). The Problem with Patronage: Constraints on Women's Political Effectiveness in Uganda. In: No Shortcuts to Power: African Women in Politics and Policy-making (eds. A.M. Goetz & S. Hassim), pp 110-139. Zed Press, London, UK. [31] Golder, B. and MacDonald, M. (2002).Population and Gender Dynamics in Coastal Conservation in East Africa. Intercoast Network Winter 2002, p.18, 19 and 38. [32] Green, K. (2006).Parity and Procedural Justice. ’Essays in Philosophy, 7 (1) (January) Unasylva, 32(130): 27. [33] Guijt, I. and M.K. Shah (eds.). (1998). The Myth of Community: Gender Issues in Participatory Development. Intermediate Technology Publications, London, UK. [34] Gurung J.D. (2002).Getting at the Heart of the Issue: Challenging Male Bias in Nepal's Department of Forests. Mt. Res. Dev., 22: 212-215. [35] Hasalkar, S. and Jadhav, V. (2004).Role of Women in the use of Non-Timber Forest Produce: A Review. Journal of Social Science, 8(3) 203-206. [36] Koirala R, Giri K, and Pokharel, BK (2008).Development and Status of Community Forestry Governance in Nepal. Paper presented at the National Convention of Society of American Foresters, Reno-Tahoe, Nevada. [37] Komarudin, H., Siagian, J. & Colfer C. (2008).Collective action to secure property rights for the poor: a case study in Jambi Province, Indonesia. Collective Action and Property Rights (CAPRi) Working Paper No. 90. International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, D.C. USA. [38] Krishna, S. (2004).‘A “genderspace’’ of community rights in natural resources management’. In S. Krishna (ed) Livelihood and Gender: Equity in Community Resource Management, New Delhi: Sage Publication, pp17-63. [39] Kuhns, M.R., Bragg, H.A. and Blahna, D.J., (2004).Attitudes and experiences of women and minorities in the urban forestry/arboriculture profession. J. Arbor., 30: 11-18. [40] Lachapelle P, R, Smith PD, McCool SF (2004).Access to power or genuine empowerment? An analysis of the three community forest groups in Nepal. Hum. Ecol., 11(1), 1-12. [41] Lidestav G and Ekström M (2000). Introducing gender studies on management behavior among non-industrial private forest owners, Scandinavian. Journal of Forest Resources, 15: 378-386. [42] Loudermilk, K. (2004).Fictional Feminism: How American Bestsellers Effect the Movement for Women's Equality. New York: Routledge. [43] Mawdsley, E. (2004). 'India's middle classes and the environment', Development and Change 35 (1): 79–103. [44] McElroy, W, (ed.), (2002a). Liberty for Women: Freedom and Feminism in the Twenty-First Century. Chicago: Ivan R. D.A [45] McElroy, W., (2002b). ‘Introduction: Foundation of Individualist Freedom.’ In McElroy (2002): 5-26. [46] Momsen, J. (2007). 'Gender and agrobiodiversity: Introduction to the special issue', Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography 28: 1–6. [47] Mwaipopo-Ako, R. (2000).Gender, Resource Utilization and Management in Coastal Tanzania. A case study of Saadani Village, Coast Region. Unpublished PhD Thesis, Dept of Social Anthropology, University of Cape Town, South Africa. [48] Mwangi E., Meinzen-Dick, R and Sun Y., (2009).Does gender influence forestry management? Exploring cases from east Africa and Latin America CID Graduate student and research fellow workshop papers No. 40.Center for international development. Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA, (online) URL:http//www.hks.harvard.edu/var/ezp_site/storage/fekeditor/file/pdfs/centers-programs/center/cid/publications/student-fellow/wp/040.pdf [49] Mwangi, E., Meinzen-Dick, R. and Sun, Y. (2011).Gender and sustainable forest management in East Africa and Latin America. Ecology and Society16(1):[online] URL: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol16/iss1/art17/ [50] Nightingale, A. (2006). ‘The nature of gender: work, gender and environment’, environment and planning Digest: Society and Space 24: 165-185. [51] Nussbaum, M., (2000). ‘The future of Feminist Liberalism.’ Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 74: 47-79. [52] Ogunjobi, J.A., Meduna, A.J., Oni, S.O., Inah, I.E., and Enya, D.A., (2010). Protection Staffs’ Job Perception in Cross River National Park, Southern Nigeria, Middle-East Journal of Scientific Research 5 (1): 22-27. [53] Oloruntoba A and O Adetokumbo (2006).Determinants of household’s participation in social forestry in a zone of northern Nigeria. Journal of food, Agriculture and Environment 4(2)320-326. [54] Ong’ayo, M.K. (2001). Mount Elgon Integrated Conservation and Development Project: Organization and Environmental Health Newsletter 25. [55] Probst, K. Hagmann, J., Fernandez, M. and Ashby, A.J. (2003). Understanding participatory research in the context of natural resource management –paradigms, approaches and typologies: Agricultural Research & Extension Network, Network Paper No. 130. [56] Rammel, C, Stagl, S. and Wilfing, H., (2007). Managing complex adaptive systems — A co-evolutionary perspective on natural resource management, Ecological Economics, 63 pp. 9 – 21, URL:www.sciencedirect .com [57] Rigg, J. D. (2006). 'Land, farming, livelihoods and poverty: Rethinking the links in the rural South', World Dev. 34 (1): 180–202. [58] Rocheleau D, Thomas-Slayter B, and Wangari, E., (1996).Gender and Environment: A feminist political ecology perspective. Routledge, New York. [59] Sainath P (2007). A forest road less travelled. The Hindu, Retrieved 13 Oct. 2008, Jan. 23. [60] Shackleton, S., Paumgarten, F., Kassa, H, Husselman, M and Zida, M., (2011). Opportunities for Enhancing Poor Women's Socioeconomic Empowerment in the Value Chains of Three African Non-Timber Forest Products (NTFPs).International Forestry Review Commonwealth Forestry Association, pp 136-151. [61] Shackleton, S., Paumgarten, F., Kassa, H., Husselman, M. and Zida, M. (2011).Opportunities for enhancing poor women’s socioeconomic empowerment in the value chains of three African non-timber forest products (NTFPs).International forestry Review 13(2): 136–151. [62] Suman S. and Aneela Z.B. (2000). Strengthening Gender Initiatives in IFAD Projects: A Case Study of Hills Leasehold Forest and Forage Development Project in Nepal, Rome: IFAD. [63] Tanya M. H. (2006).Park, people and forest protection: an institutional assessment of protected areas, World Dev., volume 34 No. 12 Elsevier. The World Bank Environmental Management Project. [64] Torri, M.C. (2010). Power structure, gender relations and community based conservation the case study of the Sariska region, Rajasthan, India, Journal of International women’s studies, 11(4), 1-18. [65] Williams, P. C. (2007). Maiden Voyages: Eastern Indonesian Women on the Move, Singapore: ISEAS Publishing [66] Yong Ooi, Lin, C. (2006). ‘Autonomy reconstructed: social and gendered implications of dam resettlement on the Orang Asil of Peninsular Malaysia’, Gender, Technology and Development 10 (1): 77-100.